A VAM Attribution Example for Morgan Dollar Collectors
Share
A Morgan dollar can look ordinary at first glance and still be a distinct die variety worth documenting. This VAM attribution example uses a familiar 1888-O Morgan dollar to show how collectors move from a date and mintmark to a defensible variety identification. The process is not about finding one interesting mark. It is about matching the right set of die diagnostics, then separating true mint-made features from contact marks, damage, and later die-state changes.
For collectors who buy certified coins or evaluate raw Morgan dollars, VAM attribution adds useful detail to the basic description. “1888-O Morgan Dollar, MS63” tells you the date, branch mint, denomination, and numerical grade. “1888-O VAM-1B” identifies the specific obverse and reverse die pairing used to strike the coin. In some cases, that attribution can materially affect collector demand and value. In others, it is simply an accurate and satisfying addition to a specialized Morgan dollar collection.
What VAM Attribution Actually Identifies
VAM numbers come from the attribution system developed by Leroy Van Allen and A. George Mallis for Morgan and Peace dollars. Each listed variety represents a particular die marriage, meaning a specific obverse die paired with a specific reverse die. The catalog also recognizes die states, including later stages where cracks, clashes, polishing, or breaks developed after the dies entered service.
That distinction matters. A doubled letter, an unusual mintmark position, or a die gouge does not automatically create a separate VAM. The feature has to correspond with a documented die marriage or die state. Conversely, a coin can have the correct date and a promising-looking mintmark yet fail attribution because another required diagnostic is absent.
VAM attribution is also separate from grading. A coin may be accurately attributed as a scarce VAM and still have cleaning, damage, weak luster, or other issues that limit its market appeal. A high-grade certified Morgan dollar can likewise be a standard variety if no meaningful VAM diagnostics are present.
VAM Attribution Example: The 1888-O VAM-1B “Scarface”
The 1888-O VAM-1B Morgan dollar is one of the best-known varieties because its primary diagnostic is visible without specialized equipment on many examples. Collectors commonly call it the “Scarface” variety. The name refers to a prominent raised die gouge that crosses Liberty’s cheek, creating the appearance of a scar.
Begin with the basic identification. The coin should be an 1888 Morgan dollar struck at the New Orleans Mint, indicated by the O mintmark on the reverse below the wreath. That alone does not make it a VAM-1B. New Orleans struck a substantial number of Morgan dollars in 1888, and many different die marriages are known.
Next, inspect Liberty’s cheek under good, angled lighting. On a genuine VAM-1B, the “scar” is a raised feature, not an incuse scratch cut into the surface after striking. This is a critical point. A gouge or crack in the die leaves a raised line on the coin because metal flows into the damaged area of the die during striking. A post-mint scratch usually cuts into the coin and will often disrupt the surrounding luster differently.
The raised cheek gouge should appear deliberate in shape and location, not random. Check it at several angles with a quality loupe or digital microscope. A circulated example may have wear that softens the feature, while an uncirculated example may show it more clearly. Toning, bag marks, and old cleaning can also make close examination more difficult.
The reverse must then be checked against the published diagnostics for the VAM-1B die pairing. This second step is where careful attribution separates a likely Scarface from a confirmed one. The obverse gouge is the easy starting point, but the reverse die characteristics and mintmark details help eliminate look-alikes and confirm the exact listing.
A complete catalog description might read: 1888-O Morgan Silver Dollar, VAM-1B Scarface, PCGS MS62. If the grading service has recognized the variety on the holder, the label provides another layer of confidence. Still, the collector should understand what the attribution means rather than relying on a nickname alone.
How to Work Through a Morgan Dollar Attribution
A sound attribution starts broad and becomes increasingly specific. First confirm the date, denomination, and mintmark. Then compare the coin to recognized VAM references, using clear photographs or direct inspection under magnification. It helps to photograph both sides before forming an opinion, especially when the coin may be submitted, sold, or discussed with another collector.
Use a consistent inspection sequence:
- Examine date digits, stars, Liberty’s hair, ear, neck, and fields on the obverse.
- Study the reverse mintmark, wreath, eagle, lettering, arrows, olive branch, and nearby field marks.
- Look for die cracks, die breaks, polishing lines, clashing, doubled devices, and misplaced digits.
- Confirm more than one diagnostic whenever the listing calls for them.
The best practice is to identify the strongest diagnostic first, then use secondary markers to verify it. In the 1888-O VAM-1B example, the cheek gouge directs your attention to a likely Scarface. It should not end the examination. The date style, mintmark area, reverse markers, and overall die state determine whether the coin is truly the documented variety.
Why Raised Versus Incuse Marks Matter
Many attribution mistakes begin when a collector sees a dramatic line and assumes it must be a die variety. Morgan dollars spent decades moving through bags, commerce, collections, and dealer inventories. They commonly show bag marks, hairlines, rim bumps, scratches, staple damage, and old cleaning. None of those are VAM diagnostics.
A mint-made raised line generally has rounded edges and flows naturally from the struck surface. Under magnification, it may show original luster continuing across it. A scratch is normally recessed, sharper, and inconsistent with the design or die surface. It may cross over other features in a way a die marker would not.
There are exceptions. Heavy circulation can flatten a raised die feature, while a deep impact can push metal upward around a scratch. This is why a single visual clue should not carry an attribution by itself. The exact location, shape, associated markers, and comparison to documented examples all matter.
When a VAM Number Adds Value
Not every VAM commands a premium. The market usually responds to a combination of rarity, visual appeal, collector recognition, grade, and the availability of comparable pieces. A dramatic and widely collected variety such as the 1888-O Scarface may attract interest even from collectors who do not pursue every die marriage. A minor variety known mainly to specialists may bring little additional premium unless it is scarce in the assigned grade.
Certification can be especially useful for varieties where the diagnostics are subtle, the coin is expensive, or the buyer wants an attribution recognized on the holder. PCGS and NGC do not necessarily attribute every known VAM on every submission tier, so collectors should review current service options before sending in a coin. A coin can be a legitimate VAM even if its existing holder does not list the attribution.
For raw coins, it is wise to balance potential upside against submission cost and risk. A common-date Morgan dollar with a modest variety may not justify grading fees unless it has strong eye appeal, a high apparent grade, or a recognized collector following. A scarce die marriage, major doubled variety, or high-value piece deserves more careful study.
Document the Coin Before You Buy or Submit
When considering a VAM Morgan dollar, keep the description precise. Record the date, mintmark, proposed VAM number, major diagnostics, grade or condition, and any certification number. If the coin is raw, retain clear obverse and reverse images along with close-ups of the key markers. That record protects you from mixing coins up later and gives a dealer or attribution specialist something useful to review.
At Chuck’s Coin Vault, we encourage collectors to ask questions before committing to an important coin. A clear photo of the full coin and the suspected diagnostic area often provides a much better starting point than a written description alone. For higher-value Morgan dollars, direct examination or third-party attribution may still be the right next step.
A good VAM attribution should leave you with more than a catchy nickname. It should tell a clear story about the dies that struck the coin, the evidence visible on its surfaces, and why that particular Morgan dollar deserves a closer place in your collection.